The context
The site puts a company’s organisation to the test every day: several firms and self-employed workers operating alongside one another, interfering activities, subcontracts, third-party plant and equipment. Title IV of Italian Legislative Decree 81/2008 sets out a chain of responsibility that runs from the client to the safety coordinators at the design and execution stages and to the principal contractor, which must verify the technical and professional fitness of the executing contractors and self-employed workers under Annex XVII, and the consistency of their operational safety plans with its own, before the execution-stage coordinator checks them against the safety and coordination plan. Since 2024 there has been a further requirement, the credit-based licence (Article 27 of Legislative Decree 81/2008, introduced by Decree-Law 19/2024): below the credit threshold set by the rule, work on site is not allowed.
Companies working for public sector clients also answer to Italian Legislative Decree 36/2023: SOA qualification by category and classification band, general eligibility requirements and grounds for exclusion, the rules on subcontracting, minimum environmental criteria and contribution compliance. For building works there is a further requirement: the attestation of the congruity of labour input issued by the Casse Edili, the construction industry funds. It is an obligation separate from the contracts code (Article 8(10-bis) of Italian Decree-Law 76/2020), required in public works and, in private ones, above the value threshold laid down. The outcomes of such checks feed into the computerised records (casellario informatico) kept by ANAC, the Italian anti-corruption authority, and into the economic operator’s virtual file: an adverse finding on one site weighs on later tenders.
At the level of corporate liability, Italian Legislative Decree 231/2001 captures the risks typical of the sector: manslaughter and serious or very serious injury through breach of workplace safety rules (Article 25-septies), environmental offences (Article 25-undecies), offences against the public administration in dealings with public sector clients (Articles 24 and 25), and unlawful labour intermediation and exploitation. The organisation and management model for safety described in Article 30 of Legislative Decree 81/2008 is the natural point of connection: the full picture is set out in Decree 231 compliance. Alongside safety sits the environment, with construction and demolition waste, excavated soil and rock (Italian Presidential Decree 120/2017) and traceability moving into the RENTRI register on staggered deadlines.
Our hands-on support
We do not simply deliver documents: we work inside the processes. A single point of contact who knows safety, public contracts and internal controls works alongside technical management, site managers, the bid office and administration, so that obligations become procedures and conduct that can be verified.
We start from the sites as they really are and from the data the company already produces: inspection reports from the enforcement authorities, accidents and near misses, findings raised by the coordinators, supplier non-conformities, complaints from clients. The order of priorities follows from there. Along the supply chain, the verification of technical and professional fitness required by Annex XVII becomes a step in supplier qualification rather than an obligation of the individual site: the same data then feed the internal audits and the flows to the Organismo di Vigilanza. The techniques of business process engineering serve to remove redundant steps between site, technical office and administration, not to add forms.
When the company has to demonstrate to clients, certification bodies and authorities what it actually does, the ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 management systems become the backbone: one body of documents, one audit programme, evidence that also serves the Decree 231 Model and the ESG questionnaires of the supply chain.
The scope is defined together: a single topic, periodic oversight of obligations and indicators, or support during peak periods. The decisions remain with the company’s own people: we bring regulatory insight, method and the ability to deliver, with responsibilities and timescales agreed at the outset.
Why a single partner
- One system for different obligations: safety, public contracts, the environment and corporate liability call for evidence that largely overlaps; we produce it once and reuse it.
- From the document to the site: compliance is measured in the work itself and along the supply chain, not in ring binders; that is why we check on site.
- Shared indicators: accidents and near misses, findings received, time taken to qualify subcontractors, recurring non-conformities, followed over time with management.
- Continuity: rules, technical annexes and tender criteria change; we stay alongside the company to update procedures, train its people and prepare for external audits and inspections.